Review



nirs brain analyzer toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc nirs brain analyzer toolbox
    Nirs Brain Analyzer Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2335 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nirs brain analyzer toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 2335 article reviews
    nirs brain analyzer toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    MathWorks Inc nirs brain analyzer toolbox
    Illustrative overview of methodologies used to unveil the sensory, neural and cellular response to plant proteins. A combination of sensory trial with untrained human participants ( n = 100) using Rate-All-That-Apply, (RATA), a study of neural response in prefrontal cortex of human participants ( n = 34) measured using <t>Functional</t> <t>Near-Infrared</t> <t>Spectroscopy</t> (fNIRS) and cellular response measured using saliva-coated oral epithelium based TR146-MUC1 cell lines was used to unveil plant protein astringency mechanisms. The astringency is uniquely detected in the prefrontal cortex of the brain leading to negative tactile responses which resulted from physical binding of plant proteins with saliva bound to oral epithelium, inducing astringency perception. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.
    Nirs Brain Analyzer Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nirs brain analyzer toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nirs brain analyzer toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Illustrative overview of methodologies used to unveil the sensory, neural and cellular response to plant proteins. A combination of sensory trial with untrained human participants ( n = 100) using Rate-All-That-Apply, (RATA), a study of neural response in prefrontal cortex of human participants ( n = 34) measured using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and cellular response measured using saliva-coated oral epithelium based TR146-MUC1 cell lines was used to unveil plant protein astringency mechanisms. The astringency is uniquely detected in the prefrontal cortex of the brain leading to negative tactile responses which resulted from physical binding of plant proteins with saliva bound to oral epithelium, inducing astringency perception. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Unveiling plant protein astringency perception through neural and cellular responses

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23836-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Illustrative overview of methodologies used to unveil the sensory, neural and cellular response to plant proteins. A combination of sensory trial with untrained human participants ( n = 100) using Rate-All-That-Apply, (RATA), a study of neural response in prefrontal cortex of human participants ( n = 34) measured using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and cellular response measured using saliva-coated oral epithelium based TR146-MUC1 cell lines was used to unveil plant protein astringency mechanisms. The astringency is uniquely detected in the prefrontal cortex of the brain leading to negative tactile responses which resulted from physical binding of plant proteins with saliva bound to oral epithelium, inducing astringency perception. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.

    Article Snippet: Data pre-processing and analysis was done using the NIRS Brain Analyzer Toolbox (operating in Matlab (MatLab 2023a, Mathworks), for pipeline of data processing see Supplementary Fig. .

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Spectroscopy, Binding Assay

    Neural response of astringent pea protein formulations compared with tannic acid (a known astringent control). Schematic diagram ( a ) of the placement of detector (blue, D1-3) and source nodes (red, S1-8) spanning the right and left dorsolateral areas (F3, F4) and dorsomedial areas (Fz) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). ( b ) Block averaged overall neural response of changes in Oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are plotted at three times points between 0–60 s. when consuming non-astringent water (Water), low astringent, viscosity matched 5 wt% total protein pea protein concentrate (PPC5), 15 wt% pea protein concentrate (PPC15) and 0.8 wt% tannic acid (TA). Beta values are plotted from T-stat ( n = 34 participants) with the colour legend indicating magnitude of difference. A positive value (warm colours) reflects increase in HbO compared to baseline whilst a negative value (cool colours) reflects decreases in HbO. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) values are presented as bar and whisker plots with the interquartile range, minimum and maximum plotted for each sample in ( c ) astringency, ( d ) thickness, ( e ) sweetness and ( f ) creaminess presented as means and standard deviations of n = 34 with Bonferonni correction. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Unveiling plant protein astringency perception through neural and cellular responses

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23836-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Neural response of astringent pea protein formulations compared with tannic acid (a known astringent control). Schematic diagram ( a ) of the placement of detector (blue, D1-3) and source nodes (red, S1-8) spanning the right and left dorsolateral areas (F3, F4) and dorsomedial areas (Fz) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). ( b ) Block averaged overall neural response of changes in Oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are plotted at three times points between 0–60 s. when consuming non-astringent water (Water), low astringent, viscosity matched 5 wt% total protein pea protein concentrate (PPC5), 15 wt% pea protein concentrate (PPC15) and 0.8 wt% tannic acid (TA). Beta values are plotted from T-stat ( n = 34 participants) with the colour legend indicating magnitude of difference. A positive value (warm colours) reflects increase in HbO compared to baseline whilst a negative value (cool colours) reflects decreases in HbO. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) values are presented as bar and whisker plots with the interquartile range, minimum and maximum plotted for each sample in ( c ) astringency, ( d ) thickness, ( e ) sweetness and ( f ) creaminess presented as means and standard deviations of n = 34 with Bonferonni correction. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.

    Article Snippet: Data pre-processing and analysis was done using the NIRS Brain Analyzer Toolbox (operating in Matlab (MatLab 2023a, Mathworks), for pipeline of data processing see Supplementary Fig. .

    Techniques: Control, Blocking Assay, Functional Assay, Spectroscopy, Viscosity, Whisker Assay