Journal: Scientific Reports
Article Title: Unveiling plant protein astringency perception through neural and cellular responses
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23836-9
Figure Lengend Snippet: Neural response of astringent pea protein formulations compared with tannic acid (a known astringent control). Schematic diagram ( a ) of the placement of detector (blue, D1-3) and source nodes (red, S1-8) spanning the right and left dorsolateral areas (F3, F4) and dorsomedial areas (Fz) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). ( b ) Block averaged overall neural response of changes in Oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) are plotted at three times points between 0–60 s. when consuming non-astringent water (Water), low astringent, viscosity matched 5 wt% total protein pea protein concentrate (PPC5), 15 wt% pea protein concentrate (PPC15) and 0.8 wt% tannic acid (TA). Beta values are plotted from T-stat ( n = 34 participants) with the colour legend indicating magnitude of difference. A positive value (warm colours) reflects increase in HbO compared to baseline whilst a negative value (cool colours) reflects decreases in HbO. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) values are presented as bar and whisker plots with the interquartile range, minimum and maximum plotted for each sample in ( c ) astringency, ( d ) thickness, ( e ) sweetness and ( f ) creaminess presented as means and standard deviations of n = 34 with Bonferonni correction. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Leeds (MEEC 16–046 and PSYC-475) by the Faculty Ethics Committee, University of Leeds, UK.
Article Snippet: Data pre-processing and analysis was done using the NIRS Brain Analyzer Toolbox (operating in Matlab (MatLab 2023a, Mathworks), for pipeline of data processing see Supplementary Fig. .
Techniques: Control, Blocking Assay, Functional Assay, Spectroscopy, Viscosity, Whisker Assay